Annual reports
The Principal Investigator (PI) must submit annual progress reports. They should do this in Ethics Review Manager (ERM) and include their signature. They do not need to provide hard copies.
The requirements for annual reporting depend on the type of approval your study has.
For single-site
research approved by the RCH HREC
- An annual report is due on the annual anniversary of the HREC approval date.
- A Project Progress Report should be completed in ERM.
- Once we have reviewed the report, we will email formal acknowledgement to the PI.
For
multi-site research approved by the RCH HREC
- An annual report is due on
the annual anniversary of the HREC approval date.
- It is the Coordinating
Principal Investigator (CPI) responsibility to ensure that progress from
all sites covered by the ethical approval is provided. Thus the CPI
should request relevant information from each site and collate this
information into the Project Progress Report.
- A Project Progress
Report must be completed and submitted in ERM by the CPI.
- Once the Project
Progress Report has been reviewed, a formal acknowledgement will
be emailed to the CPI.
- The CPI should provide a
copy of the Project Progress Report and HREC
acknowledgement to the participating sites.
- The Principal Investigator
(PI) at each accepting site should then submit their Site Progress
Report to their local Research Governance Officer; along with a
copy of the Project Progress Report and HREC
acknowledgement (for RGO information).
- If RCH is also a
participating site the RCH PI should also complete the Site
Progress Report as noted above, however you do NOT need to attach
the Project Progress Report again or our HREC acknowledgement as we have
access to this documentation. The Site Progress Report for RCH can be
submitted at the same time as the Project Progress Report.
- Once the Site
Progress Report has been reviewed from a governance
perspective, a formal acknowledgement will be emailed to the PI.
- If a participating site is
in a jurisdiction that does not use ERM the PI should submit the
documentation as required by their Research Office.
For
multi-site research approved by an external HREC - governance only at RCH
- The local RCH Principal Investigator (PI) must provide the Coordinating Principal Investigator (CPI) with relevant site information so the CPI can submit a Project Progress Report (or their equivalent report if not using ERM) to the external reviewing HREC.
- Once the Project Progress Report has been acknowledged by the HREC, the RCH PI must complete and submit a Site Progress Report in ERM; along with a copy of the Project Progress Report and HREC acknowledgement (for RGO information) obtained from the CPI.
- Once the Site Progress Report has been reviewed from a governance perspective, a formal acknowledgement will be emailed to the PI.
Final reports, including site closure reports
You should make all reports in Ethics Review Manager (ERM) and include the PI's signature. You do not need to provide hard copies.
When a study is complete, or an individual site in a multi-site study has closed, the following reporting is to be followed.
For single-site research approved by the RCH HREC
- A Project Final Report must be submitted to the HREC (via ERM) when a study has been completed (or abandoned).
- Once the report has been reviewed, a formal acknowledgement will be emailed to the Principal Investigator (PI).
For multi-site research approved by the RCH HREC - all sites closing
- It is the Coordinating
Principal Investigator (CPI) responsibility to ensure that information
from all sites covered by the ethical approval is provided. Thus the CPI
should request and collate this information into the Project Final
Report.
- A Project Final
Report must be submitted by the CPI to the HREC (via ERM) when a
study has been completed (or abandoned).
- Once the Project
Final Report has been reviewed, a formal acknowledgement will be
emailed to the CPI.
- The CPI
should provide a copy of the Project Final Report and
HREC acknowledgement to the participating sites. The participating sites should submit the documentation as required by their Research Office. This does not apply to the
RCH participating site as we have access to the Final Report documentation.
For multi-site research approved by the RCH HREC - individual sites closing only
- The RCH Coordinating Principal Investigator (CPI) should request final study information from the closing site. The CPI is then to submit a Site Closure Report (via ERM) to the RCH HREC.
- Once the Site Closure Report has been reviewed, a formal acknowledgement will be emailed to the CPI.
- The CPI should provide a copy of the Site Closure Report and HREC acknowledgement to the closing site. The closing site should submit the documentation as required by their Research Office. This does not apply to the RCH participating site as we have access to the Site Closure Report documentation.
For multi-site research approved by an external
HREC - governance only at RCH
- The local RCH Principal
Investigator (PI) must provide the Coordinating Principal Investigator
(CPI) with information to allow them to complete either a Site
Closure Report or a Project Final Report for the
external reviewing HREC as relevant. See below for which report type.
- A Site Closure Report will
be completed by the lead site CPI if an individual site is closed, and the
study continues at other sites.
- A Project Final Report will
be completed by the lead site CPI if the study has been completed at all
sites.
- Once the Project Final
Report or Site Closure Report has been reviewed by
the external HREC, a formal acknowledgement will be emailed to the CPI.
- The RCH PI should
then submit a Site Progress Report, choosing the option within of
Site Final Report (via ERM) to the RCH Research Governance Officer;
along with a copy of the Site Closure Report or Project
Final Report and the external HREC acknowledgement.
- Once the Site
Progress Report – Site Final Report has been reviewed from a
governance perspective, a formal acknowledgement will be emailed to the
PI.
Final letter to participants
At the end of your study, you should send participants a final letter. These final letter guidelines tell you how to write and submit your final letter.
Ongoing approval
The RCH HREC cannot issue fixed ethical approval periods - this is line with Victorian standards. Instead, approval is conditional on the submission of annual progress reports. For this reason, renewals are NOT required. Approval is ongoing for the life of the project and will
only end if:
- an annual report has not been submitted within six months of the due date
- a final report is submitted, or
- approval is withdrawn or suspended by the HREC